Review of the collection "Tablero de Disertaaciones" of the Editorial University of Guadalajara
References
Álvarez Ortiz, Claudia María (2007). Does philosophy improve critical skills? Tesis de maestría, Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Melbourne, Australia. [Se puede descargar de internet.]
Beardsley, M. (1950). Practical logic. Nueva York: Prentice-Hall.
Blair, J. A. y Johnson, R. H. (2011). Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. Londres: College Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2ª edición. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, F. H. van (2020). La pragma-dialéctica como teoría de la argumentación. Guadalajara: Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., and Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Freeman, J. B. (2011). Argument structure: Representation and theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilbert, M. A. (1979). How to win an argument. Nueva York. McGraw-Hill.
Gilbert, M. A. (2014). Arguing with people. Toronto: Broadview. [En español: Argumentando se entiende la gente, trad. de F. Leal Carretero, Guadalajara, Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara, 2017.]
Goodwin, J. H. (2000). Wigmore’s chart method. Informal Logic, vol. 20, núm. 3, pp. 223–243.
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Londres: Methuen. [En español: Falacias, trad. de H. Marraud, Lima, Perú, Palestra, 2016.]
Johnson, R. H. y Blair, J. A. (1977). Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Leal Carretero, F. (2021). Teoría(s) de la argumentación. Diálogo Filosófico, núm. 111, pp. 350–379.
Leal Carretero, F., coord. (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria.
Pereda, C. (1987). Debates. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Perelman, C. y Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. París: Presses Universitaires de France. [En español: Tratado de la argumentación: La nueva retórica, trad. de J. Sevilla Muñoz, Madrid, Gredos, 1989.]
Puppo, F. (2019). Informal logic: The ‘Canadian’ approach to argument. Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [En español: Los usos de la argumentación, trad. de M. Morrás y V. Pineda, Barcelona, Península, 2007.]
Vaz Ferreira, C. (1916). Lógica viva: Adaptación práctica y didáctica. Montevideo: Talleres Gráficos A. Barreiro y Ramos.
Walton, D. (1996). Argument structure: A pragmatic approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. y Brinton, A. (1997). Historical foundations of informal logic. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Wigmore, J. H. (1913). The principles of judicial proof, as given by logic, psychology, and general experience and illustrated in judicial trials. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Woods, J. y Walton, D. (1982). Argument: The logic of the fallacies. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Woods, J. y Walton, D. (1989). Fallacies: Selected papers 1972–1982. Dordrecht: Foris.
Once the text is accepted for publication in Quadripartita Ratio, the authors must sign two legal documents: the License of Use and the Declaration of Authorship.
With the License of Use, the authors agree to the publication and diffusion of their work (integration in databases, diffusion in our social media, possible reeditions, etc.). However, it authorizes the download, reproduction and distribution of all published content, as long as the content is not modified and the source is indicated (name of the journal, volume, number, pages and electronic address of the document).
With the Declaration of Authorship, the authors manifest that the work is theirs, original and unpublished.
